.
.
.
*the gospels of [‘matthew’ / ‘mark’/ ‘luke’] are referred to as the synoptic gospels because they include many of the same stories, often in a similar ‘sequence’ and in similar ‘wording’*
.
(they stand in contrast to ‘John’, whose content is comparatively distinct
(“synoptic” is derived from the ‘Greek’ words σύν (syn, “together”) and ὄψις (opsis, “view”), and describes observations that give a broad view of a subject at a particular time)
(the term synoptic (Latin: synopticus; Greek: συνοπτικός, translit. synoptikós) comes via Latin from the Greek σύνοψις, synopsis, i.e. “(a) seeing all together, synopsis”; the sense of the word in ‘English’, the one specifically applied to these 3 gospels, of “giving an account of the events from the same point of view or under the same general aspect” is a modern one)
(this strong parallelism among the 3 gospels in content, arrangement, and specific language is widely attributed to ‘literary interdependence’)
(the question of the precise nature of their literary relationship—the “synoptic problem”—has been a topic of lively debate for centuries and has been described as “the most fascinating literary enigma of all time”)
“may i ask by whom?
“why by sheer volume!”
“you fucking fool!”
(over chopper blasts on a copter rooftop runway with lavecchia as pilot)
(with a mini-trump”ed” fetus in his back pocket)
(otherwise, he’s totally immaculate)
(though he doesn’t see to have no manners…
i’m only more enamored
o meyoieoeeeeoo
aztec: mory iarty
we reached the moin
while we ignored the sea
TITLE: “DEEP SEA FISING 00? FLUKE
(the longstanding majority view favors ‘Marcan priority’, in which both ‘Matthew’ and ‘Luke’ have made direct use of the ‘Gospel of Mark’ as a source, and further holds that ‘Matthew’ and ‘Luke’ also drew from an additional hypothetical document, called ‘Q’)
.
.
.
.
.
.
💕💝💖💓🖤💙🖤💙🖤💙🖤❤️💚💛🧡❣️💞💔💘❣️🧡💛💚❤️🖤💜🖤💙🖤💙🖤💗💖💝💘
.
.
*🌈✨ *TABLE OF CONTENTS* ✨🌷*
.
.
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥*we won the war* 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥