*does ‘revealed preference theory’ truly reveal ‘consumer preference’ when the ‘consumer’ is able to afford all of the available options?*
.
(for example, if a consumer is confronted with 3 goods and he can afford to purchase all 3 A, B, and C and he chooses to first purchase A, then C, and then B – does this suggest that the consumer preference for the goods is A > C > B?)
the debate rests on the fact that since the consumer can afford all three goods and does not need to make a preferential decision, does the order of consumption reflect any preference?
.
i say it does…
nothing in life is certain…
(…and what we call ‘life’ can ‘cease’ or be ‘drastically altered’ at any (given) ‘moment’)
(“for better or worse”)
(so the sooner one receives an ‘item’, the longer one has to enjoy it)
.
.
*👨🔬🕵️♀️🙇♀️*SKETCHES*🙇♂️👩🔬🕵️♂️*
.
.
👈👈👈☜*“REVEALED PREFERENCE”* ☞ 👉👉👉
.
.
👈👈👈☜*“ECONOMIX”* ☞ 👉👉👉
*UNSOLVED MYSTERIES*
.
.
💕💝💖💓🖤💙🖤💙🖤💙🖤❤️💚💛🧡❣️💞💔💘❣️🧡💛💚❤️🖤💜🖤💙🖤💙🖤💗💖💝💘
.
.
*🌈✨ *TABLE OF CONTENTS* ✨🌷*
.
.
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥*we won the war* 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥