.
[‘8 august 1902’ – ’20 october 1984’]
.
-‘Paul Adrien Maurice Dirac’ OM FRS[9] was an English theoretical physicist who is regarded as one of the most significant physicists of the 1900s-
.
He was the Lucasian Professor of Mathematics at the University of Cambridge, a professor of physics at Florida State University and the University of Miami, and a 1933 Nobel Prize in Physics recipient
Dirac made fundamental contributions to the early development of both quantum mechanics and quantum electrodynamics
Among other discoveries, he formulated the Dirac equation which describes the behaviour of fermions and predicted the existence of antimatter.
Dirac shared the 1933 Nobel Prize in Physics with Erwin Schrödinger “for the discovery of new productive forms of atomic theory”.[11] He also made significant contributions to the reconciliation of general relativity with quantum mechanics.
Dirac was regarded by his friends and colleagues as unusual in character.
In a 1926 letter to Paul Ehrenfest, Albert Einstein wrote of a Dirac paper,
“I am toiling over Dirac. This balancing on the dizzying path between genius and madness is awful.”
In another letter concerning the Compton effect he wrote, “I don’t understand the details of Dirac at all”
.
Personal life
Early years
Paul Adrien Maurice Dirac was born at his parents’ home in Bristol, England, on 8 August 1902,[13] and grew up in the Bishopston area of the city.[14] His father, Charles Adrien Ladislas Dirac, was an immigrant from Saint-Maurice, Switzerland who worked in Bristol as a French teacher. His mother, Florence Hannah Dirac, née Holten, was born to a Cornish Methodist family in Liskeard, Cornwall.[15][16] She was named after Florence Nightingale by her father, a ship’s captain, who had met Nightingale while he was a soldier during the Crimean war.[17] His mother moved to Bristol as a young woman, where she worked as a librarian at the Bristol Central Library; despite this she still considered her identity to be Cornish rather than English.[18] Paul had a younger sister, Béatrice Isabelle Marguerite, known as Betty, and an older brother, Reginald Charles Félix, known as Felix,[19][20] who died by suicide in March 1925.[21] Dirac later recalled: “My parents were terribly distressed. I didn’t know they cared so much … I never knew that parents were supposed to care for their children, but from then on I knew.”[22]
Charles and the children were officially Swiss nationals until they became naturalised on 22 October 1919.[23] Dirac’s father was strict and authoritarian, although he disapproved of corporal punishment.[24] Dirac had a strained relationship with his father, so much so that after his father’s death, Dirac wrote, “I feel much freer now, and I am my own man.” Charles forced his children to speak to him only in French so that they might learn the language. When Dirac found that he could not express what he wanted to say in French, he chose to remain silent.[25][26]
Education
Dirac was educated first at Bishop Road Primary School[27] and then at the all-boys Merchant Venturers’ Technical College (later Cotham School), where his father was a French teacher.[28] The school was an institution attached to the University of Bristol, which shared grounds and staff.[29] It emphasised technical subjects like bricklaying, shoemaking and metalwork, and modern languages.[30] This was unusual at a time when secondary education in Britain was still dedicated largely to the classics, and something for which Dirac would later express his gratitude.[29]
Dirac studied electrical engineering on a City of Bristol University Scholarship at the University of Bristol’s engineering faculty, which was co-located with the Merchant Venturers’ Technical College.[31] Shortly before he completed his degree in 1921, he sat for the entrance examination for St John’s College, Cambridge. He passed and was awarded a £70 scholarship, but this fell short of the amount of money required to live and study at Cambridge. Despite his having graduated with a first class honours Bachelor of Science degree in engineering, the economic climate of the post-war depression was such that he was unable to find work as an engineer. Instead, he took up an offer to study for a Bachelor of Arts degree in mathematics at the University of Bristol free of charge. He was permitted to skip the first year of the course owing to his engineering degree.[32]
In 1923, Dirac graduated, once again with first class honours, and received a £140 scholarship from the Department of Scientific and Industrial Research.[33] Along with his £70 scholarship from St John’s College, this was enough to live at Cambridge. There, Dirac pursued his interests in the theory of general relativity, an interest he had gained earlier as a student in Bristol, and in the nascent field of quantum physics, under the supervision of Ralph Fowler.[34] From 1925 to 1928 he held an 1851 Research Fellowship from the Royal Commission for the Exhibition of 1851.[35] He completed his PhD in June 1926 with the first thesis on quantum mechanics to be submitted anywhere.[36] He then continued his research in Copenhagen and Göttingen.[35] In the spring of 1929, he was a visiting professor at the University of Wisconsin–Madison.[37][38]
Family
In 1937, Dirac married[39] Margit Wigner, a sister of physicist Eugene Wigner[40] and a divorcee.[41] Dirac raised Margit’s two children, Judith and Gabriel, as if they were his own.[42] Paul and Margit Dirac also had two daughters together, Mary Elizabeth and Florence Monica.[43]
Margit, known as Manci, had visited her brother in 1934 in Princeton, New Jersey, from their native Hungary and, while at dinner at the Annex Restaurant, met the “lonely-looking man at the next table”. This account from a Korean physicist, Y. S. Kim, who met and was influenced by Dirac, also says: “It is quite fortunate for the physics community that Manci took good care of our respected Paul A. M. Dirac. Dirac published eleven papers during the period 1939–46… Dirac was able to maintain his normal research productivity only because Manci was in charge of everything else”.[44]
Personality
Dirac was known among his colleagues for his precise and taciturn nature. His colleagues in Cambridge jokingly defined a unit called a “dirac”, which was one word per hour.[45] When Niels Bohr complained that he did not know how to finish a sentence in a scientific article he was writing, Dirac replied, “I was taught at school never to start a sentence without knowing the end of it.”[46] He criticised the physicist J. Robert Oppenheimer’s interest in poetry: “The aim of science is to make difficult things understandable in a simpler way; the aim of poetry is to state simple things in an incomprehensible way. The two are incompatible.”[47]
Dirac himself wrote in his diary during his postgraduate years that he concentrated solely on his research, and stopped only on Sunday when he took long strolls alone.[48]
An anecdote recounted in a review of the 2009 biography tells of Werner Heisenberg and Dirac sailing on an ocean liner to a conference in Japan in August 1929. “Both still in their twenties, and unmarried, they made an odd couple. Heisenberg was a ladies’ man who constantly flirted and danced, while Dirac—’an Edwardian geek’, as biographer Graham Farmelo puts it—suffered agonies if forced into any kind of socializing or small talk. ‘Why do you dance?’ Dirac asked his companion. ‘When there are nice girls, it is a pleasure,’ Heisenberg replied. Dirac pondered this notion, then blurted out: ‘But, Heisenberg, how do you know beforehand that the girls are nice?'”[49]
Margit Dirac told both George Gamow and Anton Capri in the 1960s that her husband had said to a house visitor, “Allow me to present Wigner’s sister, who is now my wife.”[50][51]
Another story told of Dirac is that when he first met the young Richard Feynman at a conference, he said after a long silence, “I have an equation. Do you have one too?”[52]
After he presented a lecture at a conference, one colleague raised his hand and said: “I don’t understand the equation on the top-right-hand corner of the blackboard”. After a long silence, the moderator asked Dirac if he wanted to answer the question, to which Dirac replied: “That was not a question, it was a comment.”[53][54]
Dirac was also noted for his personal modesty. He called the equation for the time evolution of a quantum-mechanical operator, which he was the first to write down, the “Heisenberg equation of motion”. Most physicists speak of Fermi–Dirac statistics for half-integer-spin particles and Bose–Einstein statistics for integer-spin particles. While lecturing later in life, Dirac always insisted on calling the former “Fermi statistics”. He referred to the latter as “Bose statistics” for reasons, he explained, of “symmetry”.[55]
Views on religion
Heisenberg recollected a conversation among young participants at the 1927 Solvay Conference about Einstein and Planck’s views on religion between Wolfgang Pauli, Heisenberg and Dirac. Dirac’s contribution was a criticism of the political purpose of religion, which Bohr regarded as quite lucid when hearing it from Heisenberg later.[56] Among other things, Dirac said:
I cannot understand why we idle discussing religion. If we are honest—and scientists have to be—we must admit that religion is a jumble of false assertions, with no basis in reality. The very idea of God is a product of the human imagination. It is quite understandable why primitive people, who were so much more exposed to the overpowering forces of nature than we are today, should have personified these forces in fear and trembling. But nowadays, when we understand so many natural processes, we have no need for such solutions. I can’t for the life of me see how the postulate of an Almighty God helps us in any way. What I do see is that this assumption leads to such unproductive questions as to why God allows so much misery and injustice, the exploitation of the poor by the rich, and all the other horrors He might have prevented. If religion is still being taught, it is by no means because its ideas still convince us, but simply because some of us want to keep the lower classes quiet. Quiet people are much easier to govern than clamorous and dissatisfied ones. They are also much easier to exploit. Religion is a kind of opium that allows a nation to lull itself into wishful dreams and so forget the injustices that are being perpetrated against the people. Hence the close alliance between those two great political forces, the State and the Church. Both need the illusion that a kindly God rewards—in heaven if not on earth—all those who have not risen up against injustice, who have done their duty quietly and uncomplainingly. That is precisely why the honest assertion that God is a mere product of the human imagination is branded as the worst of all mortal sins.[57]
Heisenberg’s view was tolerant. Pauli, raised as a Catholic, had kept silent after some initial remarks, but when finally he was asked for his opinion, said: “Well, our friend Dirac has got a religion and its guiding principle is ‘There is no God, and Paul Dirac is His prophet.'” Everybody, including Dirac, burst into laughter.[58][59]
Later in life, Dirac’s views towards the idea of God were less acerbic. As an author of an article appearing in the May 1963 edition of Scientific American, Dirac wrote:
It seems to be one of the fundamental features of nature that fundamental physical laws are described in terms of a mathematical theory of great beauty and power, needing quite a high standard of mathematics for one to understand it. You may wonder: Why is nature constructed along these lines? One can only answer that our present knowledge seems to show that nature is so constructed. We simply have to accept it. One could perhaps describe the situation by saying that God is a mathematician of a very high order, and He used very advanced mathematics in constructing the universe. Our feeble attempts at mathematics enable us to understand a bit of the universe, and as we proceed to develop higher and higher mathematics we can hope to understand the universe better.[60]
In 1971, at a conference meeting, Dirac expressed his views on the existence of God.[61] Dirac explained that the existence of God could be justified only if an improbable event were to have taken place in the past:
It could be that it is extremely difficult to start life. It might be that it is so difficult to start a life that it has happened only once among all the planets… Let us consider, just as a conjecture, that the chance of life starting when we have got suitable physical conditions is 10−100. I don’t have any logical reason for proposing this figure, I just want you to consider it as a possibility. Under those conditions … it is almost certain that life would not have started. And I feel that under those conditions it will be necessary to assume the existence of a god to start off life. I would like, therefore, to set up this connection between the existence of a god and the physical laws: if physical laws are such that to start off life involves an excessively small chance so that it will not be reasonable to suppose that life would have started just by blind chance, then there must be a god, and such a god would probably be showing his influence in the quantum jumps which are taking place later on. On the other hand, if life can start very easily and does not need any divine influence, then I will say that there is no god.[62]
Dirac did not commit himself to any definite view, but he described the possibilities for scientifically answering the question of God.[62]
Career
Dirac established the most general theory of quantum mechanics and discovered the relativistic equation for the electron, which now bears his name. The remarkable notion of an antiparticle to each fermion particle – e.g. the positron as antiparticle to the electron – stems from his equation. He was the first to develop quantum field theory, which underlies all theoretical work on sub-atomic or “elementary” particles today, work that is fundamental to our understanding of the forces of nature. He proposed and investigated the concept of a magnetic monopole, an object not yet known empirically, as a means of bringing even greater symmetry to James Clerk Maxwell’s equations of electromagnetism.
Quantum theory
Dirac’s first step into a new quantum theory was taken late in September 1925. Ralph Fowler, his research supervisor, had received a proof copy of an exploratory paper by Werner Heisenberg in the framework of the old quantum theory of Bohr and Sommerfeld. Heisenberg leaned heavily on Bohr’s correspondence principle but changed the equations so that they involved directly observable quantities, leading to the matrix formulation of quantum mechanics. Fowler sent Heisenberg’s paper on to Dirac, who was on vacation in Bristol, asking him to look into this paper carefully.[63]
Dirac’s attention was drawn to a mysterious mathematical relationship, at first sight unintelligible, that Heisenberg had established. Several weeks later, back in Cambridge, Dirac suddenly recognised that this mathematical form had the same structure as the Poisson brackets that occur in the classical dynamics of particle motion.[63] At the time, his memory of Poisson brackets was rather vague, but he found E. T. Whittaker’s Analytical Dynamics of Particles and Rigid Bodies illuminating.[64] From his new understanding, he developed a quantum theory based on non-commuting dynamical variables. This led him to the most profound and significant general formulation of quantum mechanics to date.[65] Dirac’s formulation allowed him to obtain the quantisation rules in a novel and more illuminating manner. For this work,[66] published in 1926, Dirac received a PhD from Cambridge. This formed the basis for Fermi-Dirac statistics that applies to systems consisting of many identical spin 1/2 particles (i.e. that obey the Pauli exclusion principle), e.g. electrons in solids and liquids, and importantly to the field of conduction in semi-conductors.
Dirac was famously not bothered by issues of interpretation in quantum theory. In fact, in a paper published in a book in his honour, he wrote: “The interpretation of quantum mechanics has been dealt with by many authors, and I do not want to discuss it here. I want to deal with more fundamental things.”[67]
The Dirac equation
In 1928, building on 2×2 spin matrices which he purported to have discovered independently of Wolfgang Pauli’s work on non-relativistic spin systems (Dirac told Abraham Pais, “I believe I got these [matrices] independently of Pauli and possibly Pauli got these independently of me.”),[68] he proposed the Dirac equation as a relativistic equation of motion for the wave function of the electron.[69] This work led Dirac to predict the existence of the positron, the electron’s antiparticle, which he interpreted in terms of what came to be called the Dirac sea.[70] The positron was observed by Carl Anderson in 1932. Dirac’s equation also contributed to explaining the origin of quantum spin as a relativistic phenomenon.
The necessity of fermions (matter) being created and destroyed in Enrico Fermi’s 1934 theory of beta decay led to a reinterpretation of Dirac’s equation as a “classical” field equation for any point particle of spin ħ/2, itself subject to quantisation conditions involving anti-commutators. Thus reinterpreted, in 1934 by Werner Heisenberg, as a (quantum) field equation accurately describing all elementary matter particles – today quarks and leptons – this Dirac field equation is as central to theoretical physics as the Maxwell, Yang–Mills and Einstein field equations. Dirac is regarded as the founder of quantum electrodynamics, being the first to use that term. He also introduced the idea of vacuum polarisation in the early 1930s. This work was key to the development of quantum mechanics by the next generation of theorists, in particular Schwinger, Feynman, Sin-Itiro Tomonaga and Dyson in their formulation of quantum electrodynamics.
Dirac’s The Principles of Quantum Mechanics, published in 1930, is a landmark in the history of science. It quickly became one of the standard textbooks on the subject and is still used today. In that book, Dirac incorporated the previous work of Werner Heisenberg on matrix mechanics and of Erwin Schrödinger on wave mechanics into a single mathematical formalism that associates measurable quantities to operators acting on the Hilbert space of vectors that describe the state of a physical system. The book also introduced the Dirac delta function. Following his 1939 article,[71] he also included the bra–ket notation in the third edition of his book,[72] thereby contributing to its universal use nowadays.
Magnetic monopoles
In 1931, Dirac proposed that the existence of a single magnetic monopole in the universe would suffice to explain the quantisation of electrical charge.[73] In 1975,[74] 1982[75] and 2009,[76][77][78] intriguing results suggested the possible detection of magnetic monopoles, but there is, to date, no direct evidence for their existence (see also Searches for magnetic monopoles).
Gravity
He quantized the gravitational field and developed a general theory of the quantum field with dynamical constraints, which forms the basis of the gauge theories and superstring theories of today.[79] The influence and importance of Dirac’s work have increased with the decades, and physicists use the concepts and equations that he developed daily.
University of Cambridge
Dirac was the Lucasian Professor of Mathematics at the University of Cambridge from 1932 to 1969. In 1937, he proposed a speculative cosmological model based on the so-called large numbers hypothesis. During World War II, he conducted important theoretical and experimental research on uranium enrichment by gas centrifuge.[80]
Dirac’s quantum electrodynamics (QED) made predictions that were – more often than not – infinite and therefore unacceptable. A workaround known as renormalisation was developed, but Dirac never accepted this. “I must say that I am very dissatisfied with the situation”, he said in 1975, “because this so-called ‘good theory’ does involve neglecting infinities which appear in its equations, neglecting them in an arbitrary way. This is just not sensible mathematics. Sensible mathematics involves neglecting a quantity when it is small – not neglecting it just because it is infinitely great and you do not want it!”[81] His refusal to accept renormalisation resulted in his work on the subject moving increasingly out of the mainstream.
However, from his once rejected notes he managed to work on putting quantum electrodynamics on “logical foundations” based on Hamiltonian formalism that he formulated. He found a rather novel way of deriving the anomalous magnetic moment “Schwinger term” and also the Lamb shift, afresh in 1963, using the Heisenberg picture and without using the joining method used by Weisskopf and French, and by the two pioneers of modern QED, Schwinger and Feynman. That was two years before the Tomonaga–Schwinger–Feynman QED was given formal recognition by an award of the Nobel Prize for physics.
Weisskopf and French (FW) were the first to obtain the correct result for the Lamb shift and the anomalous magnetic moment of the electron. At first FW results did not agree with the incorrect but independent results of Feynman and Schwinger.[82] The 1963–1964 lectures Dirac gave on quantum field theory at Yeshiva University were published in 1966 as the Belfer Graduate School of Science, Monograph Series Number, 3.
Florida State University and University of Miami
After having relocated to Florida to be near his elder daughter, Mary, Dirac spent his last fourteen years of both life and physics research at the University of Miami in Coral Gables, Florida, and Florida State University in Tallahassee, Florida.
In the 1950s in his search for a better QED, Paul Dirac developed the Hamiltonian theory of constraints[83] based on lectures that he delivered at the 1949 International Mathematical Congress in Canada. Dirac[84] had also solved the problem of putting the Schwinger–Tomonaga equation into the Schrödinger representation[85] and given explicit expressions for the scalar meson field (spin zero pion or pseudoscalar meson), the vector meson field (spin one rho meson), and the electromagnetic field (spin one massless boson, photon).
The Hamiltonian of constrained systems is one of Dirac’s many masterpieces. It is a powerful generalisation of Hamiltonian theory that remains valid for curved spacetime. The equations for the Hamiltonian involve only six degrees of freedom described by g_{rs},p^{rs} for each point of the surface on which the state is considered. The g_{m0} (m = 0, 1, 2, 3) appear in the theory only through the variables g^{r0}, (-{g^{00}})^{-1/2} which occur as arbitrary coefficients in the equations of motion. There are four constraints or weak equations for each point of the surface x^{0} = constant. Three of them H_{r} form the four vector density in the surface. The fourth H_{L} is a 3-dimensional scalar density in the surface HL ≈ 0; Hr ≈ 0 (r = 1, 2, 3)
In the late 1950s, he applied the Hamiltonian methods he had developed to cast Einstein’s general relativity in Hamiltonian form[86][87] and to bring to a technical completion the quantization problem of gravitation and bring it also closer to the rest of physics according to Salam and DeWitt. In 1959 he also gave an invited talk on “Energy of the Gravitational Field” at the New York Meeting of the American Physical Society.[88] In 1964 he published his Lectures on Quantum Mechanics (London: Academic) which deals with constrained dynamics of nonlinear dynamical systems including quantization of curved spacetime. He also published a paper entitled “Quantization of the Gravitational Field” in the 1967 ICTP/IAEA Trieste Symposium on Contemporary Physics.
From September 1970 to January 1971, Dirac was a Visiting Professor at Florida State University in Tallahassee. During that time he was offered a permanent position there, which he accepted, becoming a full professor in 1972. Contemporary accounts of his time there describe it as happy except that he apparently found the summer heat oppressive and liked to escape from it to Cambridge.[89]
He would walk about a mile to work each day and was fond of swimming in one of the two nearby lakes (Silver Lake and Lost Lake), and was also more sociable than he had been at the University of Cambridge, where he mostly worked at home apart from giving classes and seminars. At Florida State, he would usually eat lunch with his colleagues before taking a nap.[90]
Dirac published over 60 papers in those last twelve years of his life, including a short book on general relativity.[91] His last paper (1984), entitled “The inadequacies of quantum field theory,” contains his final judgment on quantum field theory: “These rules of renormalisation give surprisingly, excessively good agreement with experiments. Most physicists say that these working rules are, therefore, correct. I feel that is not an adequate reason. Just because the results happen to be in agreement with observation does not prove that one’s theory is correct.” The paper ends with the words: “I have spent many years searching for a Hamiltonian to bring into the theory and have not yet found it. I shall continue to work on it as long as I can and other people, I hope, will follow along such lines.”[92]
Students
Amongst his many students[4][93] were Homi J. Bhabha,[2] Fred Hoyle, John Polkinghorne[6] and Freeman Dyson.[94] Polkinghorne recalls that Dirac “was once asked what was his fundamental belief. He strode to a blackboard and wrote that the laws of nature should be expressed in beautiful equations.”[95]
Honours
Dirac shared the 1933 Nobel Prize for physics with Erwin Schrödinger “for the discovery of new productive forms of atomic theory”.[11] Dirac was also awarded the Royal Medal in 1939 and both the Copley Medal and the Max Planck Medal in 1952. He was elected a Fellow of the Royal Society in 1930,[9] an Honorary Fellow of the American Physical Society in 1948, and an Honorary Fellow of the Institute of Physics, London in 1971. He received the inaugural J. Robert Oppenheimer Memorial Prize in 1969.[96][97] Dirac became a member of the Order of Merit in 1973, having previously turned down a knighthood as he did not want to be addressed by his first name.[49][98]
Death
The tombstone of Dirac and his wife in Roselawn Cemetery, Tallahassee, Florida. Their daughter Mary Elizabeth Dirac, who died 20 January 2007, is buried next to them.
The 1927 Solvay Conference in Brussels, a gathering of the world’s top physicists. Dirac is in the center of the middle row, seated behind Albert Einstein.
In 1984, Dirac died in Tallahassee, Florida, and was buried at Tallahassee’s Roselawn Cemetery.[99] Dirac’s childhood home in Bishopston, Bristol is commemorated with a blue plaque,[100] and the nearby Dirac Road is named in recognition of his links with the city of Bristol. A commemorative stone was erected in a garden in Saint-Maurice, Switzerland, the town of origin of his father’s family, on 1 August 1991. On 13 November 1995 a commemorative marker, made from Burlington green slate and inscribed with the Dirac equation, was unveiled in Westminster Abbey.[99][101] The Dean of Westminster, Edward Carpenter, had initially refused permission for the memorial, thinking Dirac to be anti-Christian, but was eventually (over a five-year period) persuaded to relent.[102]
Legacy
In 1975, Dirac gave a series of five lectures at the University of New South Wales which were subsequently published as a book, Directions in Physics (1978). He donated the royalties from this book to the university for the establishment of the Dirac Lecture Series. The Silver Dirac Medal for the Advancement of Theoretical Physics is awarded by the University of New South Wales to commemorate the lecture.[103]
Immediately after his death, two organizations of professional physicists established annual awards in Dirac’s memory. The Institute of Physics, the United Kingdom’s professional body for physicists, awards the Paul Dirac Medal for “outstanding contributions to theoretical (including mathematical and computational) physics”.[104] The first three recipients were Stephen Hawking (1987), John Stewart Bell (1988), and Roger Penrose (1989). The International Centre for Theoretical Physics awards the Dirac Medal of the ICTP each year on Dirac’s birthday (8 August).[105]
The Dirac-Hellman Award at Florida State University was endowed by Bruce P. Hellman in 1997 to reward outstanding work in theoretical physics by FSU researchers.[106] The Paul A.M. Dirac Science Library at Florida State University, which Manci opened in December 1989,[107] is named in his honour, and his papers are held there.[108] Outside is a statue of him by Gabriella Bollobás.[109] The street on which the National High Magnetic Field Laboratory in Innovation Park of Tallahassee, Florida, is located is named Paul Dirac Drive. As well as in his hometown of Bristol, there is also a road named after him, Dirac Place, in Didcot, Oxfordshire.[110]
The BBC named a video codec, Dirac, in his honour. An asteroid discovered in 1983 was named after Dirac.[111] The Distributed Research utilising Advanced Computing (DiRAC) and Dirac software are named in his honour.
Publications
The Principles of Quantum Mechanics (1930): This book summarises the ideas of quantum mechanics using the modern formalism that was largely developed by Dirac himself. Towards the end of the book, he also discusses the relativistic theory of the electron (the Dirac equation), which was also pioneered by him. This work does not refer to any other writings then available on quantum mechanics.
Lectures on Quantum Mechanics (1966): Much of this book deals with quantum mechanics in curved space-time.
Lectures on Quantum Field Theory (1966): This book lays down the foundations of quantum field theory using the Hamiltonian formalism.
Spinors in Hilbert Space (1974): This book based on lectures given in 1969 at the University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida, USA, deals with the basic aspects of spinors starting with a real Hilbert space formalism. Dirac concludes with the prophetic words “We have boson variables appearing automatically in a theory that starts with only fermion variables, provided the number of fermion variables is infinite. There must be such boson variables connected with electrons…”
General Theory of Relativity (1975): This 69-page work summarises Einstein’s general theory of relativity.
References
Citations
^ “Nobel Bio”. Nobel Foundation. Retrieved 27 January 2014.
^ Jump up to: a b Bhabha, Homi Jehangir (1935). On cosmic radiation and the creation and annihilation of positrons and electrons (PhD thesis). University of Cambridge. EThOS uk.bl.ethos.727546.
^ Harish-Chandra, School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of St Andrews.
^ Jump up to: a b Paul Dirac at the Mathematics Genealogy Project
^ DeWitt, C. M., & Rickles, D., eds., The Role of Gravitation in Physics: Report from the 1957 Chapel Hill Conference (Berlin: Edition Open Access, 2011), p. 30.
^ Jump up to: a b Polkinghorne, John Charlton (1955). Contributions to quantum field theory (PhD thesis). University of Cambridge. EThOS uk.bl.ethos.727138.
^ Farmelo 2009
^ Cassidy, David C. (2010). “Graham Farmelo. The Strangest Man: The Hidden Life of Paul Dirac, Mystic of the Atom”. Isis. 101 (3): 661. doi:10.1086/657209. Farmelo also discusses, across several chapters, the influences of John Stuart Mill…
^ Jump up to: a b Dalitz, R. H.; Peierls, R. (1986). “Paul Adrien Maurice Dirac. 8 August 1902 – 20 October 1984”. Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society. 32: 137–185. doi:10.1098/rsbm.1986.0006. JSTOR 770111.
^ Mukunda, N., Images of Twentieth Century Physics (Bangalore: Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research, 2000), p. 9.
^ Jump up to: a b “The Nobel Prize in Physics 1933”. The Nobel Foundation. Retrieved 4 April 2013.
^ Kragh 1990, p. 82] “Dirac verstehe ich im Einzelnen überhaupt nicht (Compton-Effekt)”
^ Farmelo 2009, p. 10
^ Farmelo 2009, pp. 18–19
^ “Paul Dirac: a genius in the history of physics”. Cern Courier. 15 August 2002. Retrieved 4 February 2022.
^ Farmelo 2009, pp. 8, 441
^ Farmelo 2009, pp. 8
^ Farmelo 2009, pp. 441
^ Kragh 1990, p. 1
^ Farmelo 2009, pp. 10–11
^ Farmelo 2009, pp. 77–78
^ Farmelo 2009, p. 79
^ Farmelo 2009, p. 34
^ Farmelo 2009, p. 22
^ Mehra 1972, p. 17
^ Kragh 1990, p. 2
^ Farmelo 2009, pp. 13–17
^ Farmelo 2009, pp. 20–21
^ Jump up to: a b Mehra 1972, p. 18
^ Farmelo 2009, p. 23
^ Farmelo 2009, p. 28
^ Farmelo 2009, pp. 46–47
^ Farmelo 2009, p. 53
^ Farmelo 2009, pp. 52–53
^ Jump up to: a b 1851 Royal Commission Archives
^ Farmelo 2009, p. 101
^ Kursunoglu, Behram N.; Wigner, Eugene Paul, eds. (1990). Paul Adrien Maurice Dirac: Reminiscences about a Great Physicist. Cambridge University Press. p. 132. ISBN 0521386888. Retrieved 30 September 2020.
^ “Paul Adrien Maurice Dirac”. University of Wisconsin-Madison. Retrieved 30 September 2020.
^ Farmelo 2009, p. 284
^ Farmelo 2009, p. 253
^ Farmelo 2009, p. 256
^ Farmelo 2009, p. 288
^ Farmelo 2009, pp. 305, 323
^ Kim, Young Suh (1995). “Wigner’s Sisters”. Archived from the original on 3 March 2008.
^ Farmelo 2009, p. 89
^ “Paul Adrien Maurice Dirac”. University of St. Andrews. Retrieved 4 April 2013.
^ Mehra 1972, pp. 17–59
^ Kragh 1990, p. 17
^ Jump up to: a b McKie, Rob (1 February 2009). “Anti-matter and madness”. The Guardian. Retrieved 4 April 2013.
^ Gamow 1966, p. 121
^ Capri 2007, p. 148
^ Zee 2010, p. 105
^ Raymo, Chet (17 October 2009). “A quantum leap into oddness”. The Globe and Mail. (Review of Farmelo’s The Strangest Man.)
^ Farmelo 2009, pp. 161–162, who attributes the story to Niels Bohr.
^ Mehra, Jagdish; Rechenberg, Helmut (2001). The Historical Development of Quantum Theory. Springer Science & Business Media. p. 746. ISBN 9780387951805.
^ Pais, A., Niels Bohr’s Times: In Physics, Philosophy, and Polity (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991), p. 320.
^ Heisenberg 1971, pp. 85–86
^ Heisenberg 1971, p. 87
^ Farmelo 2009, p. 138, who says this was an old joke, pointing out a Punch footnote in the 1850s that “There is no God, and Harriet Martineau is her prophet.”
^ Dirac, Paul (May 1963). “The Evolution of the Physicist’s Picture of Nature”. Scientific American. Retrieved 4 April 2013.
^ Kragh 1990, pp. 256–257
^ Jump up to: a b Kragh 1990
^ Jump up to: a b Farmelo 2009, pp. 83–88
^ Coutinho, S. C. (1 May 2014). “Whittaker’s analytical dynamics: a biography”. Archive for History of Exact Sciences. 68 (3): 355–407. doi:10.1007/s00407-013-0133-1. ISSN 1432-0657. S2CID 122266762.
^ “Paul Dirac: a genius in the history of physics”. Cern Courier. 15 August 2002. Retrieved 13 May 2013.
^ Dirac, Paul A. M. (1926). “On the Theory of Quantum Mechanics”. Proceedings of the Royal Society A. 112 (762): 661–77. Bibcode:1926RSPSA.112..661D. doi:10.1098/rspa.1926.0133. JSTOR 94692.
^ Dirac, “The inadequacies of quantum field theory”, in B. N. Kursunoglu & E. P. Wigner, eds., Paul Adrien Maurice Dirac (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987), p. 194.
^ Behram N. Kurşunoğlu; Eugene Paul Wigner (eds.). Reminiscences about a Great Physicist. Cambridge University Press. p. 98.
^ Dirac, P. A. M. (1 February 1928). “The Quantum Theory of the Electron”. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A. 117 (778): 610–24. Bibcode:1928RSPSA.117..610D. doi:10.1098/rspa.1928.0023.
^ Paul Dirac on Nobelprize.org Edit this at Wikidata with his Nobel Lecture, December 12, 1933 Theory of Electrons and Positrons
^ P. A. M. Dirac (1939). “A New Notation for Quantum Mechanics”. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. 35 (3): 416. Bibcode:1939PCPS…35..416D. doi:10.1017/S0305004100021162. S2CID 121466183.
^ Gieres (2000). “Mathematical surprises and Dirac’s formalism in quantum mechanics”. Reports on Progress in Physics. 63 (12): 1893. arXiv:quant-ph/9907069. Bibcode:2000RPPh…63.1893G. doi:10.1088/0034-4885/63/12/201. S2CID 10854218.
^ Dirac, P. A. M. (1931). “Quantised Singularities in the Electromagnetic Field”. Proceedings of the Royal Society A. 133 (821): 60–72. Bibcode:1931RSPSA.133…60D. doi:10.1098/rspa.1931.0130.
^ P. B. Price; E. K. Shirk; W. Z. Osborne; L. S. Pinsky (25 August 1975). “Evidence for Detection of a Moving Magnetic Monopole”. Physical Review Letters. 35 (8): 487–90. Bibcode:1975PhRvL..35..487P. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.35.487.
^ Blas Cabrera (17 May 1982). “First Results from a Superconductive Detector for Moving Magnetic Monopoles”. Physical Review Letters. 48 (20): 1378–81. Bibcode:1982PhRvL..48.1378C. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.48.1378. S2CID 17169500.
^ “Magnetic Monopoles Detected in a Real Magnet for the First Time”. Science Daily. 4 September 2009. Retrieved 13 May 2013.
^ D.J.P. Morris; D.A. Tennant; S.A. Grigera; B. Klemke; C. Castelnovo; R. Moessner; C. Czternasty; M. Meissner; K.C. Rule; J.-U. Hoffmann; K. Kiefer; S. Gerischer; D. Slobinsky & R.S. Perry (3 September 2009). “Dirac Strings and Magnetic Monopoles in Spin Ice Dy2Ti2O7”. Science. 326 (5951): 411–4. arXiv:1011.1174. Bibcode:2009Sci…326..411M. doi:10.1126/science.1178868. PMID 19729617. S2CID 206522398.
^ S. T. Bramwell; S. R. Giblin; S. Calder; R. Aldus; D. Prabhakaran; T. Fennell (15 October 2009). “Measurement of the charge and current of magnetic monopoles in spin ice”. Nature. 461 (7266): 956–9. arXiv:0907.0956. Bibcode:2009Natur.461..956B. doi:10.1038/nature08500. PMID 19829376. S2CID 4399620.
^ Misha, S., Quantum Field Theory II (Singapore: World Scientific, 2019), p. 287.
^ Kemp, R. S., “Gas Centrifuge Theory and Development: A Review of US Programs”, Science and Global Security, June 2009.
^ Kragh 1990, p. 184
^ Schweber 1994
^ Canadian Journal of Mathematics, 1950, vol 2, 129; 1951, vol 3, 1.
^ 1951 “The Hamiltonian Form of Field Dynamics” Canad Jour Math, vol 3, 1
^ Phillips R. J. N. 1987 Tributes to Dirac p31 London: Adam Hilger
^ Proc Roy Soc 1958, A vol 246, 333
^ Dirac, P. A. M. (1 May 1959). “Fixation of Coordinates in the Hamiltonian Theory of Gravitation”. Physical Review. 114 (3): 924. Bibcode:1959PhRv..114..924D. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.114.924. Retrieved 16 October 2020.
^ Dirac, P. A. M., “Energy of the Gravitational Field”, Physical Review Letters, Vol. 2, Nr. 8, 20 March 1959, pp. 368–371.
^ “Paul Dirac”. Famous Scientists.
^ Pais, Abraham (2009). Paul Dirac: The Man and His Work. Cambridge University Press. p. 27. ISBN 978-0-511-56431-4. OCLC 958553083 – via Google Books.
^ Baer, H. A., & Belyaev, A., eds., Proceedings of the Dirac Centennial Symposium (Singapore: World Scientific, 2003), p. 3.
^ Pais, Abraham (2009). Paul Dirac: The Man and His Work. Cambridge University Press. p. 28. ISBN 978-0-511-56431-4. OCLC 958553083 – via Google Books.
^ O’Connor, John J.; Robertson, Edmund F., “Paul Dirac”, MacTutor History of Mathematics archive, University of St Andrews
^ Sandberg, L., “Freeman J. Dyson (1923–2020), Scientist and Writer, Who Dreamt Among the Stars, Dies at 96”, IAS, 28 February 2020.
^ John Polkinghorne. ‘Belief in God in an Age of Science’ p 2
^ Walter, Claire (1982). Winners, the blue ribbon encyclopedia of awards. Facts on File Inc. p. 438. ISBN 9780871963864.
^ “Dirac Receives Miami Center Oppenheimer Memorial Prize”. Physics Today. 22 (4): 127. April 1969. doi:10.1063/1.3035512.
^ Farmelo 2009, pp. 403–404
^ Jump up to: a b “Dirac takes his place next to Isaac Newton”. Florida State University. Archived from the original on 27 April 1997. Retrieved 4 April 2013.
^ Fells, M., Bristol Plaques (Cheltenham: The History Press, 2016), p. 40.
^ “Paul Dirac”. Gisela Dirac. Retrieved 4 April 2013.
^ Farmelo 2009, pp. 414–415.
^ “Dirac Medal awards”. University of New South Wales. Archived from the original on 12 April 2013. Retrieved 4 April 2013.
^ “The Dirac Medal”. Institute of Physics. Retrieved 24 November 2007.
^ “The Dirac Medal”. International Centre for Theoretical Physics. Retrieved 4 April 2013.
^ “Undergraduate Awards”. Florida State University. Archived from the original on 12 April 2013. Retrieved 4 April 2013.
^ “Remodelled Dirac Science Library Opened at FSU”. Graham Farmelo. 22 February 2015. Retrieved 12 October 2015.
^ “Paul A.M. Dirac Papers”. Florida State University. Retrieved 18 March 2021.
^ Farmelo 2009, p. 417
^ “Dirac Place, Didcot OX11 8TL”. Google Maps.
^ “5997 Dirac (1983 TH)”. Jet Propulsion Laboratory. Retrieved 9 January 2015.
General sources
Capri, Anton Z. (2007). Quips, Quotes, and Quanta: An Anecdotal History of Physics. Hackensack, New Jersey: World Scientific. ISBN 978-981-270-919-6. OCLC 214286147.
Crease, Robert P.; Mann, Charles C. (1986). The Second Creation: Makers of the Revolution in Twentieth Century Physics. New York City: Macmillan Publishing. ISBN 978-0-02-521440-8. OCLC 13008048.
Farmelo, Graham (2009). The Strangest Man: The Hidden Life of Paul Dirac, Quantum Genius. London: Faber and Faber. ISBN 978-0-571-22278-0. [Published in the United States as The Strangest Man: The Hidden Life of Paul Dirac, Mystic of the Atom. ISBN 978-0-465-01827-7.]
Gamow, George (1966). Thirty Years That Shook Physics: The Story of Quantum Theory. Garden City, New York: Doubleday. ISBN 978-0-486-24895-0. OCLC 11970045.
Heisenberg, Werner (1971). Physics and Beyond: Encounters and Conversations. New York City: Harper & Row. ISBN 978-0-06-131622-7. OCLC 115992.
Kragh, Helge (1990). Dirac: A Scientific Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-38089-8. OCLC 20013981.
Mehra, Jagdish (1972). “The Golden Age of Theoretical Physics: P. A. M. Dirac’s Scientific Works from 1924–1933”. In Wigner, Eugene Paul; Salam, Abdus (eds.). Aspects of Quantum Theory. Cambridge: University Press. pp. 17–59. ISBN 978-0-521-08600-4. OCLC 532357.
Schweber, Silvan S. (1994). QED and the men who made it: Dyson, Feynman, Schwinger, and Tomonaga. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-03685-4. OCLC 28966591.
Zee, Anthony (2010). Quantum Field Theory in a Nutshell. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-1-4008-3532-4. OCLC 318585662.
Further reading
Brown, Helen (24 January 2009). “The Strangest Man: The Hidden Life of Paul Dirac by Graham Farmelo – review [print version: The man behind the maths]”. The Daily Telegraph (Review). p. 20. Archived from the original on 2 February 2009. Retrieved 11 April 2011..
Gilder, Louisa (13 September 2009). “Quantum Leap – Review of ‘The Strangest Man: The Hidden Life of Paul Dirac by Graham Farmelo'”. The New York Times. Retrieved 11 April 2011. Review.
Mukunda, N. (1987) “The life and work of P.A.M. Dirac”, pages 260 to 282 in Recent Developments in Theoretical Physics, World Scientific MR935624
External links
Oral history interview transcript with P. A. M. Dirac on 1 April 1962, American Institute of Physics, Niels Bohr Library & Archives – Session I
Oral history interview transcript with P. A. M. Dirac on 6 May 1963, American Institute of Physics, Niels Bohr Library & Archives – Session II
Oral history interview transcript with P. A. M. Dirac on 7 Mary 1963, American Institute of Physics, Niels Bohr Library & Archives – Session III
Oral history interview transcript with P. A. M. Dirac on 10 May 1963, American Institute of Physics, Niels Bohr Library & Archives – Session IV
Oral history interview transcript with P. A. M. Dirac on 14 May 1963, American Institute of Physics, Niels Bohr Library & Archives – V
Free online access to Dirac’s classic 1920s papers from Royal Society’s Proceedings A
Annotated bibliography for Paul Dirac from the Alsos Digital Library for Nuclear Issues
The Paul Dirac Collection at Florida State University
The Papers of Professor Paul Dirac at Churchill Archives Centre
en.wikipedia.org /wiki/Paul_Dirac
Paul Dirac
Contributors to Wikimedia projects41-52 minutes 11/27/2001
DOI: 10.1086/657209, Show Details
Paul Dirac
OM FRS
Paul Dirac, 1933.jpg
Dirac, photographed in 1933
Born
Paul Adrien Maurice Dirac
8 August 1902
Bristol, England
Died 20 October 1984 (aged 82)
Tallahassee, Florida, U.S.
Nationality British
Alma mater
University of Bristol
University of Cambridge
Known for
show
Spouse
Margit Wigner
(m. )
Children 2
Awards
Nobel Prize in Physics (1933)
Royal Medal (1939)
Copley Medal (1952)
Max Planck Medal (1952)
Fellow of the Royal Society (1930)[1]
Scientific career
Fields Theoretical physics
Institutions
University of Cambridge
University of Miami
Florida State University
Thesis Quantum mechanics (1926)
Doctoral advisor Ralph Fowler
Doctoral students
Homi J. Bhabha[2]
Harish-Chandra[3]
Dennis Sciama
Fred Hoyle[4]
Behram Kurşunoğlu[5]
John Polkinghorne[6]
Influences John Stuart Mill[7][8]
.
.
*👨🔬🕵️♀️🙇♀️*SKETCHES*🙇♂️👩🔬🕵️♂️*
.
.
.
.
.
💕💝💖💓🖤💙🖤💙🖤💙🖤❤️💚💛🧡❣️💞💔💘❣️🧡💛💚❤️🖤💜🖤💙🖤💙🖤💗💖💝💘
.
.
*🌈✨ *TABLE OF CONTENTS* ✨🌷*
.
.
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥*we won the war* 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥